Entries Tagged as 'tech'

Gizmodon’t

I hate it when popular sites decide to be unprofessional douchebags for no reason. The Internet, for all its strengths, still has to prove itself to the the old guard and that requires professionalism. Bloggers get the bitchslap as amateur journalists even though they may do as much work if not more so than any writer for a print or television magazine. It’s not fair, but so it goes. The new kid at the table has to prove he’s mature enough to sit at the table, or else he goes back to the kiddie table.

Popular gadget Gizmodo needs to go back to the kiddie table. Their behavior continues to be unacceptable for such a high-traffic site. Back in November, Editor-in-Chief Briam Lam made the world’s most callous swag/press package unboxing as he tossed around Halo 3 merch. It’s his stuff and he’s free to do with it what he wants but why not use half-a-brain and realize that you’re already making people envious so why add insult to injury? I’m not sure whether or not Lam is a dick or just incompetent but when he made a video responding to people who called him on his behavior, he continued to be a dick/incompetent by giving away the ending to Halo 3 (at this point, Halo 3 had been out for a day). You just don’t act that smug towards your readership. It’s poor judgment.

But apparently Gizmodo has more than enough poor judgment as seen by what they thought was a totally hilarious prank. You see, at the Consumer Electronics Show this past week, they decided to turn off TVs there using a remote control! Isn’t that funny! You can almost hear the adolescent giggling. I’m not against pranks or irreverence. But aside from this prank being unfunny, it’s also a slap in the face to every electronics manufacturer there. They thought it was mostly harmless but if you’re trying to market your product, having it turn off suddenly and inexplicably makes it look unreliable. Again, with Gizmodo, you don’t know if they’re just being dicks or if they’re really that stupid.

The final nail in the coffin is Brian Lam’s comment on the story over at Valleywag (it’s the seventh post down). Rather than apologize and say “Yeah, we probably shouldn’t have done that and we want folks to know that we’re taking full responsibility and encouraging CES to not judge other sites based on our behavior,” Lam basically says that silly pranks are just how they roll and that they got a really good interview with Bill Gates so step-off!

Gizmodo has been banned from CES (and rightly so) but they need to be banned from the Internet. I like most of Gawker Media’s websites (I visit Kotaku multiple times a day), but either they need to change out their staff (especially Lam) or drop the site. There’s just no room for “professional bloggers” like these numbskulls ruining it for everyone else.

Pod-dammit.

I’m a fan of the iPod. Some of my more tech savvy friends may decry my choice of MP3 player but they don’t read this blog so fuck them!

Do I seem in a foul mood? If so, here’s why: My faithful 4th Generation iPod died on me back at the beginning of August. I’d had it since Summer of 2004 and the poor little baby just couldn’t hold a charge any more. Sure, it would charge, but when you watch your entire battery diminish after just half an hour of use, that battery ain’t working like it’s supposed to. Now I knew that a new iPod was on the horizon. The problem was that it was on the horizon since May 2006. I thought it would be a pretty sweet graduation present. I thought wrong (I got my laptop instead, which was still awesome; thanks, Mom!). And so eventually all the rumors became just that: rumors. Sure, the iPhone came out and there was an argument to be made that it was just a matter of time before Apple made an iPhone without the Phone. But then there was the counter-argument that Apple didn’t want a new iPod cutting into the iPhone sales. That may be a very shitty argument, but it’s what I heard.

But then a couple weeks ago, Apple made an announcement that they would be having a little press conference on September 5th. And all the gadget sites said it would be for new iPods. What specifically, no one knew, but it would be for new iPods.

So I’m checking Engadget’s liveblog about the event.

New ringtones for iPhone. Don’t have an iPhone–don’t care.

New iPod Nano. Looks crappy–don’t care.

New prices for what is now dubbed the “iPod Classic”. The 80GB model is now $250, which is what I paid less than a month ago for the 30GB model. Fuck me.

But Mr. Jobs isn’t done taking a torque wrench to the nipples of my soul. He’s got the “iPod Touch”. Like the iPhone, but thinner. And an iPod. And it has Wifi. And a Safari web-browser. And YouTube. And an iTunes store. And 22 hours audio and 5 hours of video. And if you get near a Starbucks, and that Starbucks happens to be playing a song you like, the option will come up to download that song. Oh wait, that last feature sucks. However, I did learn that Starbucks opens seven stores every day and all of them sell overpriced, crappy-tasting beverages. Thanks, Starbucks.

My only solace is that it costs $299 for the 8GB model and $399 for the 16GB model. If you have videos…that’s not great.

But apparently, if you got an 8GB iPhone, you’re gonna taste defeat as well because they’re slashing the price down to $399 because Steve thinks it will make a great stocking stuffer. And if you’re stockings are made out of gold and your name’s written out in diamonds, then yes, it will make a nice stocking stuffer.

Oh, and still no Beatles catalog. Well, at least my brother will finally be getting a new iPod so good for him.